|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSUMER NEWS Texas Commission for the Blind May 1, 1995 Vol. III, No. 9 Advocates for people who are blind say there is good news and bad news from Washington. The good news is a bill was introduced yesterday that demonstrates Congress is listening to consumers and wants to address their concerns about consolidation of federal job training programs. The bad news is that some critical issues still need to be addressed. The bill, cosponsored by Rep. Bill Goodling, Chairman of the House Economic and Educational Opportunities Committee, and Rep. Buck McKeon, would divide the state into +Local Workforce Development Areas. A +Local Workforce Development Board would create and monitor a system of +One-Stop Career Centers within the +Local Area. The Board would have at least one individual with a disability, but would always maintain a majority of members representing business and industry. The one-stop centers would deliver services to all individuals, including VR services to persons with disabilities. Any organization within a +Local Area could apply to be a one- stop center as long as it delivers a list of +core services, which include VR. Advocates say: The bill would allow Governors to designate a fiscal agent to receive and monitor VR funds earmarked for services to people who are blind. However, the fiscal agent would not be required to know anything about VR programs or issues related to blindness and work. The proposal significantly amends, but retains Title I of the Rehab Act, including requirements for eligibility determination, qualified staff, and priority for persons with the most severe disabilities. The amendments to Title I, however, would not ensure the same scope of services that are guaranteed under the current Rehab Act: specific services such as adaptive technology, physical restoration, reader services, orientation and mobility, or training in independent living skills. The bill includes provisions to increase an individual s personal responsibility in the rehab process by making the IWRP optional and creating a voucher system for purchasing VR services. The scope of VR services in each +Local Area would be negotiated by the Local Workforce Development Board and the organizations applying to become one-stop centers. Advocates fear services would be significantly different from area to area. Consumer control and involvement in the state s overall VR program would be traded for increased choice and responsibility in the individual s rehab process. Final discussion (markup) by the subcommittee will take place on May 17. Advocates say that if you are concerned about consumer control and involvement in the VR system or access to specific services for people who are blind, contact your local representative and those listed below. Advocates say any consolidation proposal must guarantee: that the scope of VR services +shall include specific services for people who are blind, as guaranteed in the current Rehab Act, and that the designated agent to receive VR funds be knowledgeable about VR programs, as required in the current Rehab Act. Write to Representatives at: Hon. (Representative's name) U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Bill Goodling, Chairman House Economic and Educational Opportunities Committee (202) 225-5836 (202) 226-1000 Gene Green (202) 225-1688 (voice) (202) 225-9903 (fax ) Howard P. "Buck" McKeon Chairman, Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education, Training and Life-long Learning (202) 225-1956 (voice) (202) 226-0683 (fax) tellbuck@hr.house.gov Sam Johnson (202) 225-4201 (voice) (202) 225-1485 (fax) samtx03@hr.house.gov |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||